Youth Presentations
Kiran Patel
This
paper aims to investigate the rise and presence of communalism
in Britain. Through examining certain components of South Asian
identity through the diaspora, what will he revealed is that the
process of migration has instigated specific nationalisms in relation
to motherlands left behind.
Through a specific insight into Gujarati nationalism,
a deconstruction will take place of why it has arisen, under what
circumstances and the reasons for its appeal. In a country such
as Britain, who through its racist, capitalist and patriarchal
structures subordinates all South Asians, a fervent religious
loyalty in connection to origins of descent becomes focal. A means
through which an association with South Asian roots can be maintained
without feeling that the sense of religion, culture and tradition
has been diluted to the extent of depletion by the west. The danger
lies with a nationalism which can then be seen as similar and
associated to the 'pseudo-nationalism' of the Bharatiya Janata
Party and the Sangh Parivar. The BJP and its associates then find
a base within the diaspora who conveniently become a source of
funding, as can be seen through the maintenance of the Vishwa
Hindu Parishad by Non- Resident Indians.
The South Asian youth are now made to feel as
though they have a channel through which to place their anger
and frustrations, whilst their 'identity finds a concrete foundation
with political parties, nations and ideologies. Yet the ideologies
of such parties such as the BJP instil a hatred of all others,
who are outside of the ascribed 'Hindu' via the hindutva guidelines,
especially the hatred of Muslims. This way of thinking conveniently
fits into the anti-Muslim hysteria within Britain, US and the
west. Such so-called nationalisms promote racism, capitalism and
patriarchy. For women, such an ideology offers very little, other
than a gender-specific role within tight patriarchal confines.
The main role of the woman being producers of the 'nation', and
as the instillers of values, tradition and culture. Anything outside
of such a role is deemed as too 'western' or 'not Indian enough'.
A dangerous combination when identity is confused with elements
which work to mould identity into one homogenized category, one
to suit the needs of those who invent it and who do not know the
real meaning of a nationalism for the people.
Kiran Patel